OBJECTIVE OF FEEDBACK
The college is affiliated to Acharya Nagarjuna university, Guntur. The syllabus framed by Pharmacy
Council of India and is implemented in the affiliated colleges. The IQAC of the college identifies
the curricular gaps and plans for co-curricular/extracurricular activities in college.
The institution aims to offer the best possible environment and learning experience to encourage
students to perform to their full potential for academic achievement.
Stakeholders i.e., students, teachers, alumni and employers play an important role in the evaluation,
development and enhancements of quality of this learning process.
Hence the college obtains feedback from all the stakeholders i.e., students, teachers, alumni and
employers every academic year on curriculum/syllabi to evaluate its service policies and can be
revised to enrich the quality of activities performed in college for improvement of the professional
skills, employability and entrepreneurial skills of the students.
SUMMARY OF FEEDBACK OBTAINED FROM THE STAKEHOLDERS IS AS FOLLOWS:
| S.NO |
STAKEHOLDERS |
NO. OF SAMPLE FEEDBACKS ANALYSED |
| 1 |
UG STUDENTS |
20 |
| 2 |
PG STUDENTS |
10 |
| 3 |
TEACHERS |
20 |
| 4 |
ALUMNI |
10 |
| 5 |
EMPLOYERS |
05 |
The feedback on curriculum was taken from the students of all years, Teachers and Alumni
at the end of each academic year.
UG STUDENTS FEEDBACK ON CURRICULUM ANALYSIS
ACADEMIC YEAR 2023-24
| S.NO |
QUESTIONNAIRE |
FEEDBACK% |
| 1 |
Size of the syllabus in terms of the load on students |
99 |
| 2 |
The syllabus was challenging |
87 |
| 3 |
How do you rate the extent of syllabi covered in the class? |
91 |
| 4 |
Syllabus equipped with necessary skills to face the industry |
93 |
| 5 |
The recommended textbooks are adequately available and map on to the syllabus |
91 |
| 6 |
How do you rate the out of class room learning (guest lectures, seminars, workshops, value
added programs, conferences, competitions)? |
86 |
| 7 |
The laboratory experiments correlate with the theory (Experimental learning) |
95 |
| 8 |
The depth of the course content is adequate |
87 |
| 9 |
How do you rate the transparency in the evaluation process? |
93 |
| 10 |
Overall Experience |
97 |
PG STUDENTS FEEDBACK ON CURRICULUM ANALYSIS
ACADEMIC YEAR 2023-24
| S.NO |
QUESTIONNAIRE |
FEEDBACK% |
| 1 |
Size of the syllabus in terms of the load on students |
96 |
| 2 |
The syllabus was challenging |
96 |
| 3 |
How do you rate the extent of syllabi covered in the class? |
92 |
| 4 |
Syllabus equipped with necessary skills to face the industry |
90 |
| 5 |
The recommended textbooks are adequately available and map on to the syllabus |
94 |
| 6 |
How do you rate the out of class room learning (guest lectures, seminars, workshops, value
added programs, conferences, competitions)? |
96 |
| 7 |
The laboratory experiments correlate with the theory (Experimental learning) |
90 |
| 8 |
The depth of the course content is adequate |
90 |
| 9 |
How do you rate the transparency in the evaluation process? |
94 |
| 10 |
Overall Experience |
92 |
TEACHERS FEEDBACK ON CURRICULUM ANALYSIS
ACADEMIC YEAR 2023-24
| S/NO |
QUESTIONNAIRE |
FEEDBACK% |
| 1 |
Course content present in syllabus |
98 |
| 2 |
Effectiveness of the curriculum to face competitive exams |
90 |
| 3 |
Practical content is relevant to theory |
90 |
| 4 |
The course outcomes are well defined and clear |
|
|
93 |
|
| 5 |
Relevance of the curriculum to the society needs |
94 |
| 6 |
Curriculum contains basic and updated concepts |
92 |
| 7 |
Sufficient number of relevant reading materials and digital resources are available in the
library. |
93 |
| 8 |
The course has good balance between theory and application. |
90 |
| 9 |
Opportunities for employment and entrepreneurship |
90 |
| 10 |
The course/syllabus of this course increased my knowledge and perspective in the subject
area. |
90 |
ALUMNI FEEDBACK ON CURRICULUM DESIGN ANALYSIS
ACADEMIC YEAR 2023-24
| S/NO |
QUESTIONNAIRE |
FEEDBACK% |
| 1 |
Curriculum balance between theoretical and practical courses |
94 |
| 2 |
Curriculum contributes /motivates to pursue higher studies |
90 |
| 3 |
How do you rate experiential learning (hands-on) of the courses? |
|
|
86 |
|
| 4 |
Industrial visits |
86 |
| 5 |
How do you rate the training and placement support in the curriculum? |
|
|
90 |
|
| 6 |
Curriculum is guiding the students to prepare for competitive exams |
90 |
| 7 |
How do you rate the usefulness of institute-industry tie ups? |
90 |
| 8 |
How do you rate the availability of relevant reading materials and digital resources in the
library? |
92 |
| 9 |
How do you rate the academic initiatives undertaken for the benefit of students? |
88 |
| 10 |
How do you rate co-curricular activities arranged during your study period? |
90 |
EMPLOYER FEEDBACK ON CURRICULUM DESIGN ANALYSIS
ACADEMIC YEAR 2023-24
| S/NO |
QUESTIONNAIRE |
FEEDBACK% |
| 1 |
Communication and attitude |
100 |
| 2 |
How do you rate the student’s ability to work in teams? |
88 |
| 3 |
How do you rate the relevance of the curriculum for employability? |
92 |
| 4 |
Your level and satisfaction with teaching /learning facilities provided by the college |
92 |
| 5 |
How do you rate the transparency of the academic processes of the institute? |
92 |
| 6 |
The curriculum promotes leadership qualities |
92 |
| 7 |
How do you rate the overall learning ambience of the college |
92 |
| 8 |
The curriculum enhances problem solving mentality and ability to innovate |
92 |
| 9 |
How do you rate the technical knowledge of the students? |
92 |
| 10 |
Overall impression about the organization |
88 |
